Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Mit Technology Review Editor Email for Letters to Editor

Mit Technology Review Editor Email for Letters to Editor

Post a Comment

Magazine about engineering science

MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review modern logo.svg
Editor-in-Primary Mat Honan[1]
Categories Science, applied science
Frequency Bimonthly
Publisher Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau
Total circulation
(2011)		 161,529[2]
Starting time consequence 1899; 123 years agone  (1899)
Company MIT Technology Review[3]
Country Us
Based in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Language English
Website technologyreview.com Edit this at Wikidata
ISSN 0040-1692

MIT Technology Review is a bimonthly mag wholly owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Engineering science, and editorially contained of the university.[4] It was founded in 1899 as The Technology Review ,[v] and was re-launched without "The" in its name on April 23, 1998 under then publisher R. Bruce Journey. In September 2005, it was changed, under its then editor-in-master and publisher, Jason Pontin, to a form resembling the historical magazine.

Before the 1998 re-launch, the editor stated that "aught will be left of the old mag except the name." Information technology was therefore necessary to distinguish between the modernistic and the historical Engineering Review.[5] The historical magazine had been published past the MIT Alumni Association, was more closely aligned with the interests of MIT alumni, and had a more intellectual tone and much smaller public circulation. The magazine, billed from 1998 to 2005 as "MIT'southward Magazine of Innovation," and from 2005 onwards as only "published by MIT", focused on new technology and how it is commercialized; was sold to the public and targeted at senior executives, researchers, financiers, and policymakers, likewise as MIT alumni.[5] [half dozen]

In 2011, Technology Review received an Utne Reader Contained Press Award for Best Science/Engineering science Coverage.[7]

History [edit]

Original magazine: 1899–1998 [edit]

Technology Review was founded in 1899 under the name The Technology Review and relaunched in 1998 without "The" in its original name. It currently claims to exist "the oldest engineering science mag in the globe."[8]

In 1899, The New York Times commented:[9]

We give a cordial welcome to No. 1 of Vol. I of The Technology Review, a Quarterly Magazine Relating to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published in Boston, and under charge of the Clan of Form Secretaries. As far every bit make-upward goes, cover, paper, typography and illustrations are in keeping with the strong characteristics of the Institution it represents. This magazine, as its editors denote, is intended to be "a clearing house of information and thought," and, as far as the Found of Technology is concerned, "to increase its power, to minimize its waste, to insure [sic] amongst its countless friends the nearly perfect co-operation."

The career path of James Rhyne Killian illustrates the close ties between Technology Review and the Constitute. In 1926, Killian graduated from college and got his first job as assistant managing editor of Engineering science Review; he rose to editor-in-principal; became executive assistant to then-president Karl Taylor Compton in 1939; vice-president of MIT in 1945; and succeeded Compton as president in 1949.

The May 4, 1929 issue contained an article by Dr. Norbert Wiener, and so Assistant Professor of Mathematics, describing some deficiencies in a paper Albert Einstein had published earlier that year. Wiener likewise commented on a cardinal's critique of the Einstein theory saying:

The pretended incomprehensibility of the Einstein theory has been used every bit capital letter by professional anti-Einsteinians. Without prejudice to the crusade of faith, I may remark that theological discussions have non at all times been distinguished by their character of lucidity.

The historical Engineering science Review often published manufactures that were controversial, or disquisitional of certain technologies. A 1980 issue independent an commodity by Jerome Wiesner attacking the Reagan administration's nuclear defense strategy. The comprehend of a 1983 issue stated, "Fifty-fifty if the fusion programme produces a reactor, no i will want it," and contained an article by Lawrence Thousand. Lidsky,[10] associate managing director of MIT's Plasma Fusion Middle, challenging the feasibility of fusion ability (which at the time was frequently fancied to exist just around the corner). The May 1984 effect contained an exposé near microchip manufacturing hazards.

In 1966, the mag started using a puzzle cavalcade started in Tech Engineering News a few months earlier. Its author is Allan Gottlieb, who has now written the column for more than than l years.[11]

As tardily every bit 1967, the New York Times described Applied science Review equally a "scientific journal." Of its writing way, writer George V. Higgins complained:

Technology Review, co-ordinate to [and so-editor] Stephen [sic] Marcus... [subjects] its scientific contributors to rewrite rigors that would give fainting spells to the most obstreperous cub reporter. Marcus believes this produces readable prose on cabalistic subjects. I don't agree.[12]

In 1984, Engineering Review printed an article nearly a Russian scientist using ova from frozen mammoths to create a mammoth-elephant hybrid called a "mammontelephas".[13] Apart from existence dated "Apr one, 1984", in that location were no obvious giveaways in the story. The Chicago Tribune News Service picked it upward every bit a real news item, and it was printed as fact in hundreds of newspapers.

The prank was presumably forgotten by 1994, when a survey of "opinion leaders" ranked Engineering Review [5] No. ane in the nation in the "nigh credible" category.[14]

Contributors to the magazine besides included Thomas A. Edison, Winston Churchill, and Tim Berners-Lee.[15]

Relaunch: 1998–2005 [edit]

A radical transition of the magazine occurred in 1996. At that fourth dimension, according to the Boston Business Periodical,[16] in 1996 Technology Review had lost $ane.6 million over the previous seven years and was "facing the possibility of folding" due to "years of declining advert acquirement."

R. Bruce Journey was named publisher, the first total-time publisher in the magazine'south history. According to previous publisher William J. Hecht, although Applied science Review had "long been highly regarded for its editorial excellence," the purpose of appointing Journey was to raise its "commercial potential" and "secure a prominent identify for Technology Review in the competitive earth of commercial publishing."[17] John Benditt replaced Steven J. Marcus every bit editor-in-chief, the entire editorial staff was fired, and the modern Technology Review was born.

Boston Globe columnist David Warsh[18] described the transition by saying that the magazine had been serving up "sometime 1960s views of things: humanist, populist, ruminative, suspicious of the unseen dimensions of new technologies" and had now been replaced with one that "takes innovation seriously and enthusiastically." Former editor Marcus characterized the mag's new stance as "cheerleading for innovation."

Under Bruce Journey, Applied science Review billed itself as "MIT's Magazine of Innovation". Since 2001, information technology has been published past Technology Review Inc., a nonprofit contained media company owned by MIT.[nineteen]

Intending to entreatment to business organization leaders, editor John Benditt said in 1999, "Nosotros're actually nearly new technologies and how they get commercialized." Technology Review covers breakthroughs and current issues on fields such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, and computing. Articles are also devoted to more mature disciplines such every bit energy, telecommunication, transportation, and the military.

Since Journey, Technology Review has been distributed as a regular mass-market mag and appears on newsstands. Past 2003, circulation had more than tripled from 92,000 to 315,000, well-nigh half that of Scientific American, and included 220,000 paid subscribers and 95,000 sent costless to MIT alumni. Additionally, in August 2003, a German language edition of Technology Review was started in cooperation with the publishing house Heinz Heise (circulation of nigh 50,000 as of 2005). Co-ordinate to The New York Times,[20] as of 2004 the magazine was still "partly financed by Thou.I.T. (though it is expected to turn a profit somewhen)."

Technology Review also functions as the MIT alumni magazine; the edition sent to alumni contains a dissever section, "MIT News," containing items such as alumni form notes. This department is non included in the edition distributed to the general public.

The magazine is published by Engineering Review, Inc, an contained media visitor owned by MIT. MIT's website lists it as an MIT publication,[21] and the MIT News Office states that "the magazine often uses MIT expertise for some of its content." In 1999 The Boston Globe noted that (autonomously from the alumni section) "few Engineering science Review manufactures actually concern events or inquiry at MIT."[22] Withal, in the words of editor Jason Pontin:

Our task is not to promote MIT; but we analyse and explain emerging technologies,[23] and because nosotros believe that new technologies are, generally speaking, a good thing, nosotros do indirectly promote MIT's core activity: that is, the development of innovative technology.[24]

From 1997 to 2005, R. Bruce Journey held the title of "publisher"; Journey was too the president and CEO of Technology Review, Inc. Editors-in-primary have included John Benditt (1997), Robert Buderi (2002), and Jason Pontin (2004).

The magazine has won numerous Folio! awards, presented at the annual magazine publishing trade show conducted by Page! mag. In 2001, these included a "Silvery Folio: Editorial Excellence Honour" in the consumer scientific discipline and technology magazine category and many awards for typography and pattern.[25] In 2006, Technology Review was named a finalist in the "general excellence" category of the annual National Magazine Awards, sponsored by the American Guild of Magazine Editors.[26]

On June 6, 2001, Fortune and CNET Networks launched a publication entitled Fortune/CNET Technology Review.[27] MIT sued[28] Fortune 's parent corporation, Fourth dimension, Inc. for infringement of the Applied science Review trademark.[29] The case was quickly settled. In August the MIT student newspaper reported that lawyers for MIT and Time were reluctant to talk over the case, citing a confidentiality understanding that both sides described as very restrictive. Jason Kravitz, a Boston attorney who represented MIT in the case, suggested that the mag's change of name to Fortune/CNET Tech Review, a change that occurred in the middle of the case, may accept been role of the settlement.[xxx]

Many publications roofing specific technologies have used "technology review" equally part of their names, such as Lawrence Livermore Labs'south Free energy & Applied science Review,[31] AACE's Educational Technology Review,[32] and the International Diminutive Energy Agency'due south Nuclear Technology Review. [33]

In 2005, Technology Review, along with Wired News and other engineering publications, was embarrassed by the publication of a number of stories by freelancer Michelle Delio containing information which could not be corroborated. Editor-in-principal Pontin said, "Of the ten stories which were published, only three were entirely accurate. In ii of the stories, I'1000 fairly confident that Michelle Delio either did not speak to the person she said she spoke to, or misrepresented her interview with him."[34] The stories were retracted.

Modern magazine: 2005–nowadays [edit]

On August 30, 2005, Engineering Review appear that R. Bruce Journey, publisher from 1996 to 2005, would be replaced by the then current Editor in Chief, Jason Pontin, and would reduce the print publication frequency from eleven to six issues per year while enhancing the publication's website.[34] The Boston Globe characterized the alter as a "strategic overhaul." Editor and publisher Jason Pontin stated that he would "focus the print magazine on what print does best: present[ing] longer-format, investigative stories and colorful imagery." Technology Review's Web site, Pontin said, would henceforth publish original, daily news and analysis (whereas before it had merely republished the print magazine'due south stories). Finally, Pontin said that Applied science Review'due south stories in print and online would identify and analyze emerging technologies.[35] This focus resembles that of the historical Applied science Review. Pontin convinced re-create editors to adopt the diaeresis marker for words like "coördinate", a rarity in native English usage, though failed to convince them to use logical punctuation.[36]

Without evident annotate, the July/August, 2017, effect revealed a shift in summit personnel, with Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau listed every bit Chief Executive Officer and Publisher, and David Rotman as Editor.[ane] Gideon Lichfield was named editor-in-master in November 2017.[37]

In 2020, it was launched the brazilian version of MIT Engineering science Review, known as MIT Technology Review Brasil.[38]

Every year, the magazine publishes a list of the 10 technologies it considers the most influential.[39]

Annual lists [edit]

Each year, MIT Technology Review publishes three almanac lists:

  • Innovators Nether 35 (formerly TR35)
  • ten Breakthrough Technologies
  • fifty Smartest Companies

Innovators Under 35 [edit]

MIT Engineering science Review has become well known for its annual Innovators Nether 35. In 1999, and and then in 2002—2004, MIT Technology Review produced the TR100, a list of "100 remarkable innovators under the age of 35." In 2005, this listing was renamed the TR35 and shortened to 35 individuals under the age of 35. Notable recipients of the award include Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, PayPal co-founder Max Levchin, Geekcorps creator Ethan Zuckerman, Linux developer Linus Torvalds, BitTorrent developer Bram Cohen, MacArthur "genius" bioengineer Jim Collins, investors Micah Siegel and Steve Jurvetson, and Netscape co-founder Marc Andreessen.[40] [41] The list was renamed Innovators Under 35 in 2013.

10 Breakthrough Technologies [edit]

2021 [edit]

Source:[42]

  1. Messenger RNA vaccines
  2. GPT-3
  3. Data trusts
  4. Lithium-metal batteries
  5. Digital contact tracing
  6. Hyper-accurate positioning
  7. Remote everything
  8. Multi-skilled AI
  9. TikTok recommendation algorithms
  10. Green hydrogen

2020 [edit]

Source:[43]

  1. Unhackable internet
  2. Hyper-personalized medicine
  3. Digital money
  4. Anti-aging drugs
  5. AI-discovered molecules
  6. Satellite mega-constellations
  7. Breakthrough supremacy
  8. Tiny AI
  9. Differential privacy
  10. Climate change attribution

2019 [edit]

MIT Engineering science Review editors invited Bill Gates to choose the 2019 listing.[44]

  1. Robot dexterity
  2. New-wave nuclear power
  3. Predicting preemies
  4. Gut probe in a pill
  5. Custom cancer vaccines
  6. The cow-gratuitous burger
  7. Carbon dioxide catcher
  8. An ECG on your wrist
  9. Sanitation without sewers
  10. Smoothen-talking AI assistants

2018 [edit]

Source:[45]

  1. 3-D metal printing
  2. Artificial embryos
  3. Sensing urban center
  4. AI for everybody
  5. Dueling neural networks
  6. Babel-fish earbuds
  7. Zero-carbon natural gas
  8. Perfect online privacy
  9. Genetic fortune-telling
  10. Materials' quantum jump

2017 [edit]

Source:[46]

  1. Reversing paralysis
  2. Self-driving trucks
  3. Paying with your face
  4. Practical quantum computers
  5. The 360-caste selfie
  6. Hot solar cells
  7. Cistron therapy two.0
  8. The jail cell atlas
  9. Botnets of things
  10. Reinforcement learning

2016 [edit]

Source:[47]

  1. Immune engineering
  2. Precise gene editing in plants
  3. Conversational interfaces
  4. Reusable rockets
  5. Robots that teach each other
  6. DNA app shop
  7. SolarCity's Gigafactory
  8. Slack
  9. Tesla Autopilot
  10. Power from the air

2015 [edit]

Source:[48]

  1. Magic leap
  2. Nano-architecture
  3. Car-to-auto advice
  4. Project Loon
  5. Liquid biopsy
  6. Megascale desalination
  7. Apple tree Pay
  8. Brain organoids
  9. Supercharged photosynthesis
  10. Net of Dna

2014 [edit]

Source:[49]

  1. Agricultural drones
  2. Ultraprivate smartphones
  3. Brain mapping
  4. Neuromorphic chips
  5. Genome editing
  6. Microscale 3-D printing
  7. Mobile collaboration
  8. Oculus Rift
  9. Active robots
  10. Smart current of air and solar power

2013 [edit]

Source:[50]

  1. Smart watches
  2. Ultra-efficient solar power
  3. Memory implants
  4. Prenatal DNA sequencing
  5. Deep learning
  6. Additive manufacturing
  7. Big data from cheap phones
  8. Temporary social media
  9. Supergrids
  10. Baxter: the bluish-collar robot

2012 [edit]

Source:[51]

  1. Egg stem cells
  2. Ultra-efficient solar
  3. Light-field photography
  4. Solar microgrids
  5. 3-D transistors
  6. A faster Fourier transform
  7. Nanopore sequencing
  8. Crowdfunding
  9. Loftier-speed materials discovery
  10. Facebook's Timeline

2011 [edit]

Source:[52]

  1. Social ondexing
  2. Smart transformers
  3. Gestural interfaces
  4. Cancer genomics
  5. Solid-country batteries
  6. Homomorphic encryption
  7. Deject streaming
  8. Crash-proof code
  9. Separating chromosomes
  10. Synthetic cells

2010 [edit]

Source:[53]

  1. Real-time search
  2. Mobile 3-D
  3. Engineered stem cells
  4. Solar fuel
  5. Light-trapping photovoltaics
  6. Social TV
  7. Green concrete
  8. Implantable electronics
  9. Dual-action antibodies
  10. Deject programming

2009 [edit]

Source:[54]

  1. Intelligent software banana
  2. $100 genome
  3. Racetrack memory
  4. Biological machines
  5. Paper diagnostics
  6. Liquid bombardment
  7. Traveling-moving ridge reactor
  8. Nanopiezoelectronics
  9. HashCache
  10. Software-defined networking

Recognition [edit]

In 2006, Technology Review was a finalist in the National Magazine Awards in the category of General Excellence.[55]

In 2010, Technology Review won the gilt and silver prizes for best full event of a technology magazine (for its Nov and June 2009 issues) and the golden, silverish, and bronze prizes for best unmarried article in a technology mag (for "Natural Gas Changes the Free energy Map" by David Rotman;[56] "Prescription: Networking" by David Talbot;[57] and "Chasing the Sun" by David Rotman)[58] in the Page Magazine Eddie Awards.[59]

In 2007, Technology Review won the bronze prizes in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards in the categories of best issue of a technology magazine and best single technology article.[60] That same twelvemonth, technologyreview.com won tertiary place in the MPA Digital Awards for best concern or news Website and second place for best online video or video series.[61]

In 2008, Engineering science Review won the gold prize for the best issue of a engineering magazine (for its May 2008 upshot); the gold, silverish, and bronze prizes for all-time single articles in a technology mag (for The Price of Biofuels by David Rotman;[62] Brain Trauma in Iraq by Emily Singer;[63] and Una Laptop por Niño past David Talbot);[64] the gilt prize for all-time online customs; and the bronze prize for best online tool in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[65] That same year, Technology Review won 3rd place in the Mag Publishers of America (MPA) Digital Awards for best online videos.[66]

In 2009, Technology Review won the aureate prize for Best Online News Coverage; the golden and silver prizes for best single articles in a technology magazine (for "How Obama Really Did It" by David Talbot)[67] and "Can Engineering science Relieve the Economy?" by David Rotman[68] and the silvery prize for all-time online community in the Page Magazine Eddie Awards.[69]

In 2011, Technology Review won the argent prize for best full effect of a engineering science magazine (for its January 2011 event) and the gold and silver prizes for best single article in a technology magazine (for "Moore's Outlaws" past David Talbot[lxx] and "Radical Opacity" past Julian Dibbell)[71] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[72] That aforementioned twelvemonth, Technology Review was recognized for the best science and engineering science coverage in the Utne Reader Independent Press Awards.[73]

In 2012, MIT Engineering science Review won the aureate and silver prizes for all-time full event of a technology magazine (for its June and October 2012 issues), and the aureate and bronze prizes for best single commodity in a engineering mag (for "People Power 2.0" by John Pollock[74] and "The Library of Utopia" by Nicholas Carr)[75] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[76] That same year, MIT Technology Review won the gold prize for best characteristic design (for "The Library of Utopia" by Nicholas Carr)[75] in the Page Magazine Ozzie Awards.[77]

Meet as well [edit]

  • Citizen Science (The OED cites an commodity from the MIT Technology Review in Jan 1989[78] as the first use of the term 'citizen science'.)

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b "MIT Technology Review names Mat Honan its new editor in chief". MIT Engineering Review (Printing release). July 19, 2021. Retrieved Feb 7, 2022. Honan starts at MIT Technology Review on August 17.
  2. ^ "AAM: Full Circ for Consumer Magazines". Accessabc.com. Archived from the original on 2012-06-04. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  3. ^ "Terms of Service". MIT Technology Review. Baronial 12, 2013. Retrieved February seven, 2022. MIT Engineering Review is an independent media company owned by the Massachusetts Found of Technology (MIT).
  4. ^ "Our coverage is independent of whatever influence, including our ownership past MIT". Retrieved 2018-11-10 .
  5. ^ a b c d "Atechreview". Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  6. ^ "MIT Technology Review". Retrieved 2021-11-05 .
  7. ^ "Utne Independent Printing Awards: 2011 Winners". Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  8. ^ Withal, Scientific American has been published continuously since 1845, and Popular Scientific discipline since 1872. In the personal communication cited above, Pontin says that the claim rests on the definition of a magazine as being perfect spring, Scientific American being in paper tabloid format in 1899.
  9. ^ The New York Times, January 21, 1899, page BR33.
  10. ^ Lidsky, Lawrence One thousand. (Oct 1983). "The Trouble with Fusion" (PDF). MIT Technology Review. pp. 32–44. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  11. ^ Amanda Schaffer (December 22, 2015). "Puzzle Corner's Keeper". MIT Technology Review . Retrieved February 7, 2022. Allan Gottlieb '67 has been serving up math challenges to alumni and friends for one-half a century.
  12. ^ The Boston World, July 17, 1982.
  13. ^ http://www.textfiles.com/humor/woolly_m.amm Archived Dec x, 2004, at the Wayback Motorcar
  14. ^ Charles H. Ball, News Role (1 February 1995). "Technology Review rated 'most credible'". MIT News . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  15. ^ Crum, Male monarch (April 13, 1998). "MIT's 'TR' undergoes revamping". Bizjournals.com. Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  16. ^ "MIT'southward 'TR' undergoes revamping". Boston Business Periodical . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  17. ^ The Boston Globe, Apr 25, 1999 p. G1
  18. ^ The Boston World, April 21, 1998 p. C1 "Gloom, Doom and Boom at MIT." Warsh analogized the onetime TR with dearest departed Cambridge eateries similar the F&T Cafeteria.
  19. ^ [1] Archived April 30, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ The New York Times, Nov x, 2004, p. 8, "Glossy Alumni Magazines Seek More than Than Graduates"
  21. ^ "MIT - offices+services". Mit.edu . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  22. ^ The Boston Globe, Apr 25, 1999 p. G1 "MIT Tech Magazine, On Plateau, Finds Killer App: Commercialism"
  23. ^ "Emerging Technologies Reviews".
  24. ^ Jason Pontin, personal email to Dpbsmith, August 27, 2005
  25. ^ David Rapp, Applied science Review (28 November 2001). "Engineering science Review wins 6 awards". MIT News . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  26. ^ "Archived copy". searchpdffiles.com. Archived from the original on 11 Feb 2016. Retrieved 15 Jan 2022. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  27. ^ Wall Street Journal Staff (2001-01-22). "Fortune, Cnet Enter Pact For Issues of Tech Reviews". The Wall Street Periodical. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2021-03-xi . {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-condition (link)
  28. ^ "MIT sues Fourth dimension Inc. over magazine proper name". Boston Concern Journal . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  29. ^ Trademark registration 0668713, registered Oct 21, 1958 to "Alumni Association of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology" and renewed in 1999.
  30. ^ "MIT Finishes 3 Lawsuits, Initiates One During Summer". Mit.edu. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  31. ^ "Energy and Technology Review". Llnl.gov . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  32. ^ [2] Archived October 17, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  33. ^ "Nuclear Technology Review 2004" (PDF). Iaea.org. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  34. ^ a b The Boston Globe, April 22, 2005, p. C3 "More of Writer's Stories Faulted—MIT Says Just 3 of 10 were Accurate"
  35. ^ Jason Pontin (2005). "A Alphabetic character to MIT Alumni". Technology Review . Retrieved 2006-06-26 .
  36. ^ "You Become No Gotten in the New Yorker". As for the diareses, it'southward just something we do: information technology shows you that the second vowel is pronounced equally a second syllable. The New Yorker does it in this state, and information technology's not uncommon in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland. There are a couple of other idiosyncratic fashion uses that I've been less successful in imposing on our copy desk-bound. I'd love to insist on what's called "logical punctuation" in the English style, but the moral weight of the company insists that 'MIT Technology Review is an American publication.' (original comment on [3] before comments were disabled)
  37. ^ "MIT Technology Review Names Gideon Lichfield Editor in Chief". Technology Review. 2017. Archived from the original on 2018-xi-ten. Retrieved 2019-03-13 .
  38. ^ https://mittechreview.com.br/.
  39. ^ Review, MIT Engineering. "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2006 - MIT Technology Review". Retrieved twenty September 2017.
  40. ^ "TR 100: Computing". MIT Technology Review . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx . [ permanent dead link ]
  41. ^ "TR 35". MIT Applied science Review . Retrieved 2015-03-30 . [ permanent dead link ]
  42. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2021".
  43. ^ "2020".
  44. ^ "2019".
  45. ^ "2018".
  46. ^ "2017".
  47. ^ "2016".
  48. ^ "2015".
  49. ^ "2014".
  50. ^ "2013".
  51. ^ "ten Breakthrough Technologies 2012".
  52. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2011".
  53. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2010".
  54. ^ "ten Breakthrough Technologies 2009".
  55. ^ "Archived re-create". Archived from the original on 2006-08-19. Retrieved 2006-07-27 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally title (link)
  56. ^ "Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map". MIT Technology Review.
  57. ^ "Prescription: Networking". MIT Engineering Review.
  58. ^ "Chasing the Dominicus". MIT Applied science Review.
  59. ^ "2010 Folio: Award Winners Announced". Folio. 2011-01-25.
  60. ^ "The 2007 Eddie & Ozzie Award Winners". Page. November 2007.
  61. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-03-10. Retrieved 2007-03-06 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally title (link)
  62. ^ "The Price of Biofuels". MIT Engineering Review.
  63. ^ "Brain Trauma in Iraq". MIT Technology Review.
  64. ^ "Una Laptop por Niño". MIT Technology Review.
  65. ^ "2008 Eddie Awards Winners". Folio. 2008-09-23.
  66. ^ MPA Digital Awards 2008 Archived 2008-03-02 at the Wayback Machine
  67. ^ "How Obama Really Did It". MIT Technology Review.
  68. ^ "Can Technology Save the Economic system?". MIT Technology Review.
  69. ^ "2009 Eddie Award Winners". Folio. December 2009.
  70. ^ "Moore's Outlaws". MIT Technology Review.
  71. ^ "Radical Opacity". MIT Technology Review.
  72. ^ "The 2011 Eddie and Ozzie Award Winners". Page. 2011-12-08.
  73. ^ "Utne Independent Printing Awards: 2011 Winners". Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2011-06-08 .
  74. ^ "People Power 2.0". MIT Technology Review.
  75. ^ a b "The Library of Utopia". MIT Technology Review.
  76. ^ "Folio Mag Eddie Awards 2012" (PDF). technologyreview.com.
  77. ^ "Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards 2012" (PDF). creative.red7media.com.
  78. ^ R. Kerson (1989). "Lab for the Surroundings". MIT Engineering Review. Vol. 92, no. i. pp. 11–12.

External links [edit]

  • Official website Edit this at Wikidata

boggstheasks.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Technology_Review

Post a Comment for "Mit Technology Review Editor Email for Letters to Editor"